Re: CFC: Tombstone "formerType" Property Range Needs Clarification (Issue #440 Activity Streams)

Why does the erratum only give a "possible" correction? Shouldn't it be
more definite if we're going to apply this to the editor's draft?

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 10:05 AM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote:

> This is a call for consensus for an erratum to apply to the Activity
> Vocabulary specification. If there are no objections in 14 calendar days
> (Sep 12 2025 23:59:59 AOE), I will add this text to the Activity Streams
> errata and apply the change to the editor's draft of the Activity
> Vocabulary document.
>
> The issue is linked here with further discussion:
> https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/440
>
> The proposed erratum is:
>
> *In Section 4, the range of the formerType property is given as Object.
> The property should have the same range as the type property for which it
> forms a replacement for deleted Tombstone objects. One possible correction
> is to replace the range of the formerType property with anyURI, to
> match type.*
>
> Evan
>