Thanks for the note! I don't think we can change that, but it's worth pointing out on the list. Evan On 2025-08-09 10:25 p.m., Evan Gilgenbach wrote: > I'll note for completeness' sake that when viewing the errata on the > mailing list archive, it hardwraps the JSON string and > inadvertently recreates the error: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2025Aug/0012.html. > It might be worth stating the error more concretely (Something like "A > literal newline is included in the HTML representation of the JSON > string in a position that would be invalid if you took the HTML > representation literally") > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 11:08 AM a <a@trwnh.com> wrote: > > The \n would be inappropriate because the content is not supposed > to have a newline in it. The newline was included to prevent the > example from overflowing the example box. The correct fix is > twofold -- first, remove the line break; second, enable wrapping > within css/respec. >
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2025 19:57:30 UTC