- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:45:41 -0300
- To: "public-swicg@w3c.org" <public-swicg@w3c.org>
Friends, we're about to go into our next CG meeting. Hopefully, we can agree on a working group (WG) charter to recommend to W3C to implement for managing the next phases of ActivityPub. We are blocked on the scope of that group. On the one hand, some people want to have an ActivityPub/Activity Streams stack only. Others want to include all the other recommendations that came out of the Social Web Working Group (2014-2019), including the IndieWeb stack documents. I proposed a way to split the difference, including all documents in scope, but letting the WG organize and plan its own work: https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters/issues/83 If we cannot come to a conclusion on this working group charter, the W3C will work on one without us. I'd prefer to have the SocialCG make this plan, but that depends on us working together to make that happen. So: if you had strong objections last CG meeting, please plan on coming to the meeting today. And please come with compromise, consensus and collaboration in mind. Evan
Received on Friday, 4 April 2025 15:45:47 UTC