Re: ActivityPub editor's draft

Evan,
Thanks again for kicking this off, I'm incredibly excited about AP getting
an ongoing Editors Draft.

One change that I'd like to propose, though -- can we move the AP Editor's
Draft to the SWICG github org?
We don't want incoming developers to be confused that the SWICG-stewarded
changes represent the old WG's work.
Meaning, we can add a link to the top of the TR that says something like
work is continuing at the SWICG, here's link to editor's draft, etc.
It'll also help with the governance of the E.D., since most of us in the
group don't have access to the WG's repo.

Dmitri



On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:48 PM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote:

> There is a new ActivityPub editor's draft available here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/activitypub/
>
> It's based on incorporating errata that have accumulated over the past
> few years. It has no other changes. Changelog here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/activitypub/#changelog
>
> There are issues with the introductory data, and ReSpec is grumpy about
> some of the metadata elements. I'm going to see what I can do to improve
> them.
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped make this draft better.
>
> Evan
>
>
>