Re: HTTP Signature CG report

Yes! Great minds think alike, we have those as
https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-http-signature/issues/17 and
https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-http-signature/issues/1#issuecomment-1920149317
.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:30 PM Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Feb 5, 2024, at 11:34, Ryan Barrett <public@ryanb.org> wrote:
>
> Hot on the heels of Evan's and a's announcement of the Webfinger CG report
> last week, I'm pleased to say that nightpool and I will be editing a
> similar CG report on HTTP Signatures in the fediverse.
>
>
> Excellent! Thank you both for doing this!!
>
> Can I suggest thinking of two sections:
>
> 1) how current implementations work
> 2) what would have to happen to upgrade to a later http signatures draft
> without breaking the installed base
>
>
> Johannes Ernst
>
> Fediforum <https://fediforum.org/>
> Dazzle Labs <https://dazzlelabs.net/>
>
>

-- 
https://snarfed.org/