Re: New project for documenting miscellaneous terms

I'm not disagreeing with that, I'm just saying that whatever comments
anyone might have about the @vocab feature, the 4 mastodon extensions
discussed on the repo so far (and all approved by the CG) have nothing to
do with @vocab because they define themselves explicitly in the @context
document

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024, 7:05 PM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote:

> The extensions policy currently in draft version explicitly says that new
> extensions should define a unique namespace.
>
> https://swicg.github.io/extensions-policy/
>
> Evan
>
> On Apr 7, 2024 19:47, nightpool <eg1290@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (That's not the recommended way to do extensions any more,
> but it was popular in the early days of AP.)
>
> Is this true? All of the extensions I've seen that we use for Mastodon
> explicitly say {@id: "as:whatever"} in the context document. Which
> extensions are you referring to?
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024, 6:37 PM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote:
>
> Hello! In our meeting on Friday, the CG decided to create a report
> documenting widely-used terms added to the Activity Streams 2.0
> namespace using the "@vocab" feature so far in the history of the protocol.
>
> (If you just drop a property into an AS2 document, because the AS2
> context document includes '@vocab: "_:"', those properties are in the
> AS2 namespace. That's not the recommended way to do extensions any more,
> but it was popular in the early days of AP.)
>
> The goal of this report is to document popular terms inserted into the
> AS2 namespace, and include them in a separate context document. Then, we
> can use the Extensions Policy to add the terms into the AS2 context.
>
> The secondary goal is to test the SocialCG's extension policy, currently
> in draft status:
>
> https://swicg.github.io/extensions-policy/
>
> This project would push the bounds of that extension policy in at least
> one way; it doesn't use a well-defined namespace -- by definition! But
> otherwise it should be a good test of the policy.
>
> If you have ideas for existing undocumented AS2 terms seen in the wild
> that should be included, please make a note here:
>
> https://github.com/swicg/miscellany/issues
>
> The current context doc is here:
>
> https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/miscellany
>
> And the document will be here when it's written (currently boilerplate
> ReSpec):
>
> https://swicg.github.io/miscellany/
>
> Lastly, I had one person step forward to help out with this; if you
> think you'd be a good co-editor on this document, let me know.
>
> Evan
>
>
>
>