- From: Juan Caballero <virtualofficehours@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:33:52 +0200
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 September 2023 09:34:00 UTC
+1 the two wickedest problems we currently face are 1.) who defines (and thus gatekeeps) the status of "implementer" of a given set of specs, and 2.) which implementations are "significiant"/production-grade/widely-used, which end-user metrics matter, etc if both of those questions were trivial to define and agree on, we might only have complex problems which could be swiftly dispatched by a panel of experienced implementers, but instead we have wicked problems without consensual definitions. thanks, __bumble On 9/23/2023 2:41 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > "A WG will invite experienced implementers as Experts to participate > in the group" > > Who decides what an "experienced implementer" is, and on what criteria? >
Received on Monday, 25 September 2023 09:34:00 UTC