Re: SWICG Community Meeting on September 22nd

If there is time at the end of the agenda, I’d like to discuss with those present their views on an operational agreement on a hypothetical operational agreement to not adopt group decisions via sync calls, and especially If the text/rationale of those group agreements is crafted on the same call. This was very common in SocialWG, but it seems ripe for abuse (e.g. wait for someone to not attend a meeting and then decide to propose/pass something), and not the best way of ensuring broad consensus mandate, and not the best way to ensure we make hard group decisions with well-considered and defensible rationale.

If there’s not time, no worries. We can discuss async on-list.

> On Sep 22, 2023, at 7:48 AM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have a link to the meeting please ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Aaron
> 
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 11:15, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com <mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I added a link to the TPAC SocialCG meeting to https://github.com/swicg/meetings
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:36 AM Juan Caballero <virtualofficehours@gmail.com <mailto:virtualofficehours@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I like the github.com/swicg <http://github.com/swicg> approach being used so far!
>>> 
>>> On 9/21/2023 8:54 PM, James wrote:
>>> > Do you have a preference with regard to where meeting notes should be 
>>> > archived? We will make sure all minutes from last week's TPAC meetings 
>>> > are archived.
>>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Gray - @AaronNGray@fosstodon.org <>
> 
> Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist.
>