Re: AS2/AP tasks for a chartered social web working group

čt 21. 9. 2023 v 11:06 odesílatel Benjamin Goering <ben@bengo.co> napsal:

> Did you just call Jack Dorsey the inventor of microblogging?
>

I thought he did, but perhaps it is not the case.

Apparently they were first known as tumbleblogs in 2005 (acc. to
wikipedia).  Article also lists related protocols (which is interesting):

Atom
ActivityPub
IndieAuth
Nostr
RSS
Webmention


>
> On Sep 20, 2023, at 11:10 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> st 20. 9. 2023 v 12:16 odesílatel Bumblefudge von CASA <
> virtualofficehours@gmail.com> napsal:
>
>> On 20/09/2023 09:55, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> I mention it because, depending on who you speak to, Nostr is already
>> part of the functioning fediverse.
>>
>> On 19/09/2023 09:38, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> Highly controversial items put a charter at risk, so we should avoid
>> that.  Let's stick to ActivityPub, ActivityStreams and fediverse in general.
>>
>> So let me get this straight, Nostr *is* the Fediverse because it's been
>> bridged, and Mitra
>> <https://codeberg.org/silverpill/mitra/src/branch/main/src/activitypub/identifiers.rs#L18>
>> (which loyally implements the AP spec) *isn't* because you don't like the
>> authentication choices it made?
>>
>
> Nostr is well-integrated with the fediverse, recognized in projects like
> Bridgy, mostr, ditto, and Soapbox. It's endorsed by notable figures
> including Edward Snowden, Bob Martin, and Jack Dorsey, inventor of
> microblogging. Its operation within the fediverse has been consistent from
> my perspective. Given its current functionality, standardizing bridges
> might be less urgent. Indieweb also appears to integrate smoothly with the
> broader fediverse.
>
> I haven't offered any commentary on Mitra and am not familiar with the
> project.
>
>
>>
>> I would remind the rest of the list that many implementers are not even
>> subscribed to this list or attending our calls. We will not bring them back
>> into the conversation by moving the goalposts on what qualifies as an
>> implementation, or by gatekeeping their implementation choices with a
>> Working Group charter that excludes their work to date.
>>
>
>