- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 14:43:24 +0200
- To: hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org>
- Cc: public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJtt3cODi+7hcer=0WtnJb018FWhH4Y-7UL3SLuipNiQA@mail.gmail.com>
st 4. 10. 2023 v 9:22 odesÃlatel hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org> napsal: > We do have an ActivityPub Community Group -- a Special Interest Group > actually, in the form of the SocialHub. > > If Aaron Parecki thinks it's good to keep the SocialCG and work with > ActivityPub within a broader context of the Social Web protocols, then I > see no reason to split again. We can continue ActivityPub ground work on > the SocialHub, relay to the SocialCG and get the best of both worlds. > > The SocialHub was created to give momentum to the ActivityPub community > following the ActivityPub Conference held in Prague in 2019, and > organized very generously by Sebastian Lasse. It was a great success and > we anticipated much work to do that would become much noise for the > SocialCG mailing-list, since this list was larger than just ActivityPub. > > If now the people we wanted to avoid spamming are fine with getting the > heat, I see no reason to move away and apart. On the contrary, I feel > like we are in a situation where we have a real grassroots community > that is grounded in free software and works on Codeberg and the > SocialHub, and a standards-oriented community group who can relay and > give body to already chewed on ground work. This is the best situation > we can imagine, where the grassroots implementors lead the way and the > standards-oriented people renders that body of work normative. > > I am not a driving force in the specification process, so I'm happy > whatever decision is made, but I want to underline both the grassroots > effort that have been going on over the last four years around the > SocialHub, as well as the renewed interests by the Chair to consolidate > the normative form of ActivityPub and ActivityStreams. This is a great > opportunity to engage more people with more confidence in the process, > and not isolate other protocols that, if they are less visible, are no > less important to our common success. > A Venn Diagram was mentioned. There are a few around over the years, here is perhaps an idea for: "The Venn of Social" [image: image.png] https://m.primal.net/HMgy.png Different people will want to work on different thing. There's a broad social web. And there's the fediverse. At the intersection is activity pub. With other open protocols emerging via bridges and interop efforts. > > == > hk > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2023 12:43:43 UTC