- From: Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 19:10:10 -0400
- To: Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf>
- Cc: Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@gmail.com>, public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANnQ-L65LdkzdJaxy6aJJ6=F9V7EkFbmK+K6Fq0VbXs_Vs8csg@mail.gmail.com>
Right, so, they emphasize this on the Credentials Community Group calls all the time. Calls are open to the general public. If the group is working on a spec, then to make any substantial contributions to the spec, you have to have signed the agreement. On Fri, May 12, 2023, 3:58 PM Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf> wrote: > Unless I'm misunderstanding this call to be open to the public > > On Fri, May 12, 2023, at 19:58, Jacky Alcine wrote: > > If they've joined the CG _and_ signed that agreement. > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2023, at 19:27, Johannes Ernst wrote: > >>> On May 12, 2023, at 11:55, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> And no, to be very clear: one does not have to be a member of W3C or > sign an IPR agreement to join CG calls. > >> > >> Agreed on the W3C membership, but not re IPR the way I read this: > >> https://www.w3.org/community/about/ > >> > >> Also, the SWICG home page at https://www.w3.org/community/socialcg/ > says: > >> > >>> Anyone may join this Community Group. All participants in this group > have signed the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement. > >> > >> > >> I would consider anybody joining a CG-hosted call to be a “participant” > >> in the CG, no? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Johannes Ernst > >> Blog: https://reb00ted.org/ > >> FediForum: https://fediforum.org/ > >> Dazzle: https://dazzle.town/ > >
Received on Friday, 12 May 2023 23:10:29 UTC