- From: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:09:28 +0100
- To: Peter F Brown <peter@pensive.eu>
- CC: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>, public-sweo-ig@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
It was Peter F Brown who said at the right time 17.01.2008 08:04 the following words: > I don't think the issue is as simple as that. You are right about the OASIS spec .... > to the same real world subject if they carry the same identifier. RDF has no such - pragmatic - mechanism. The reliance on the use of the law of identity doesn't help as it assumes that for any two things, you can only assert that they are identical if the set of their properties are equivalent, ... owl:inverseFunctionalProperty does define that for RDF (as far as I undestood your concern) and is in best practice for foaf:mbox_sha1sum best Leo
Received on Sunday, 20 January 2008 23:10:34 UTC