Re: Slashdot story with FAQs

I reloaded the javascript from Lee (which is now accessibility-friendly) 
and I have changed the SW-FAQ 'back' to its more interactive format. I 
think it is way more readable that way (thanks Lee again).

Ivan

Ivan Herman wrote:
> The problem with /. is that it is difficult to distil real comments and 
> questions:-(
> 
> I saw the startup stuff with O'Reilly and it comes back to the usual 
> misunderstanding of 'building from above' versus bottom-up. Things like:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#whgiantont
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#noTermAgreement
> 
> I wonder what to add...
> 
> (The SW-FAQ has grown quite tremendously. I wonder whether we could make 
> it more readable. Lee, has that Javascript issue been solved that led to 
> the mini-storm on accessibility?)
> 
> Ivan
> 
> Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I just discovered that Slashdot had a recent article:
>> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/10/2041235
>> now with the title "Semantic Web Getting Real", which is progress...
>>
>> Now, the comments on /. gives a steady stream of the usual 
>> misunderstandings, but up-modded misunderstandings are probably shared 
>> by a relatively large number of people, so I would think they are a 
>> good source of questions for our FAQ?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Kjetil Kjernsmo
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf