Re: checking "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web" comments... would like more time

Hi Stuart,

we reviewed the document and left in many @@ to show that we have worked 
on these sections, also including comments such as
"@@ The next paragraphs address a recommendation by TAG to weaken our 
"err on the side of caution" recommendation by explaning the problem 
better. TAG members may verify if their recommendation was met by our 
explanation."

So, looking at  [2] I would say
(1) we both agreed that this was not crucial and we decided not to do it 
becuase of readability
(2) this is still outstanding but not crucial
(3) has been addressed, we would like to hear your opinion about the 
changed text

for (3) ("err on the side of caution") we added a reference to the AWWW.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-cooluris-20071217/#distinguishing

I would humbly ask, to speed up the process we have (facing the end of 
SWEO) to skim through the document and read the @@ comments to check if 
you agree wiht the decisions we made regarding your prior comments.

Once you agree to the @@, we can safely remove them, some of them are 
intentionally left in to allow you to read our discussion and answers to 
suggested changes.

best
Leo

It was Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) who said at the right time 
25.01.2008 17:00 the following words:
> Susie, Leo,
>
> Norm Walsh has taken a review pass over the recent changes to the "Cool URIs..." document checking the changes against comments which he raised in [1]. He's posted his comments on www-tag@w3.org at [2].
>
> Norm notes 3 comments that do not appear to have been accepted or adopted. He indicates:
> - satisfaction that the group has considered the first;
> - a lack of clarity about the disposition of the second;
> - and no apparent change on the third.
>
> Norm also notes a number of @@ and editorial comments that have yet to be resolved and are indicative of at least one more editorial cycle.
>
> Accordingly, we would be happy to review the entire document again once the editors have resolved the remaining issues that they indicate as outstanding.
>
> Best regards
>
> Stuart Williams
> for W3C TAG
> --
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Sep/0090
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Jan/0067
>
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Susie M Stephens [mailto:STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM]
>> Sent: 18 January 2008 16:13
>> To: Dan Connolly
>> Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org; public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org;
>> Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
>> Subject: Re: checking "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web"
>> comments... would like more time
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> It would clearly be good if you could get all comments to us
>> by Jan 21.
>> However, we very much value input from the TAG, so we can be
>> somewhat flexible.
>>
>> SWEO is currently chartered to finish at the end of January,
>> but if absolutely necessary we could explore extending the
>> group by a month.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Susie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>              Dan Connolly
>>              <connolly@w3.org>
>>              Sent by:
>>           To
>>              public-sweo-ig-re         public-sweo-ig@w3.org
>>              quest@w3.org
>>           cc
>>                                        "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs,
>>                                        Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
>>              01/17/2008 03:58
>>      Subject
>>              PM                        checking "Cool URIs for the
>>                                        Semantic Web" comments... would
>>                                        like  more time
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In today's TAG teleconference, we took note of the recent draft
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-cooluris-20071217/
>>
>> As our comments on earlier drafts go back as far Sep 2007
>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Sep/0091
>> it's taking us some time to swap them back in to check they
>> way they were addressed in your 17 Dec draft.
>>
>> Regarding...
>> "comments should possibly be sent until 21 January 2008."
>> ... we're not likely to meet that deadline. We expect to get
>> some of our double-check done by 24 Jan, but some of it may
>> take a little longer. I hope you can stand by.
>>
>> --
>> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
____________________________________________________
DI Leo Sauermann       http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann 

Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer 
Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122
P.O. Box 2080           Fon:   +49 631 20575-116
D-67663 Kaiserslautern  Fax:   +49 631 20575-102
Germany                 Mail:  leo.sauermann@dfki.de

Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
____________________________________________________