Re: Fwd: [Semantic_Web] Survey results available: "The Semantic Web Vision: Where are We?"

Danny,

Unfortunately, I am out of town, so I could only quickly scan through
the paper. But is _is_ interesting, and I will have to read it more
thoroughly.

I presume you refer to figure 5. It is really interesting, though not
really clear to me. What it tells me is that, on the one hand, OWL+RDFS
has really become the main set of tools for ontologies, leaving the
others, F-logic, WSML, Common Logic, etc, far behind. Of course, the
fact that these are standards really counts (although we should not
forget about the technical problems around OWL+RDFS; put it another way,
we should not dismiss the values of other tools!).

However, it is not clear how many of those use _only_ RDF(S). Because
RDF(S) is 64.9% and OWL is 75.9%, this is not clear at all to me. I
actually cannot really interpret this result...

This stuff would merit a blog. Would you do the honour? I am on the road...

Cheers

Ivan

Danny Ayers wrote:
> fyi
> 
> (There seems to be an OWLish slant to the survey, yet the summary says
> "It shows that the Semantic Web does not even need OWL and can achieve
> important objectives such as data-sharing and data-integration using
> just RDF alone."...hmm)
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jorge Cardoso <jcardoso@uma.pt>
> Date: 16 Oct 2007 19:42
> Subject: [Semantic_Web] Survey results available: "The Semantic Web
> Vision: Where are We?"
> To: Semantic Web <semantic_web@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: jcardoso@uma.pt
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Semantic Web researcher,
> 
> We would like to thank all the researchers from academia and industry
> that have participated in the survey that we did last December with
> the topic "The Semantic Web Vision: Where are We?". The survey
> involved more than 600 professionals.
> 
> The most important results have been published with IEEE Intelligent
> Systems, Sep/Oct07, pp.22-26.
> 
> The original paper with all the results is available and can be
> downloaded from http://dme.uma.pt/jcardoso/
> 
> Thanks again for your contribution.
> Regards,
> Jorge
> 
> 
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Semantic Web" group.
> To post to this group, send email to semantic_web@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> semantic_web-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/semantic_web?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 13:35:36 UTC