- From: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:03:38 +0200
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org, paul@segala.com
- Message-ID: <465D3DEA.4010207@ifi.lmu.de>
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Tuesday 29 May 2007 17:27, Paul Walsh - Segala wrote: > >> Blue is best for me - aren't you delighted I'm part of this group >> with my contribution over the past while... my preferred colour is >> very important! :) >> > > Very! :-) > > My preference is number 3, I feel there isn't enough in the simple ones > to associate with the semantic web. > > Hi, I share the opinions on the current proposals expressed until now...well, Kjetil, I can't say that I like number 3 :) ... but, I also think that the first cover has no association with the SW. Still, the blue color used is perfect: It is a nice, warm color (not strong as the pink one and not 'strange' as the green one) and it is also the W3C logo color. Ivan's comments on the difficulty to read the text should also be taken into account for the next proposal. Thus, I think it would be best to have a simple, blue cover where the title (Semantic Web) is not that small to look for it (as is the case for nr 2,3, and 4) and the subtitle (Realizing the Web of Data) follows the layout of nr 2,3, and 4 but without pink and green. Also, a couple of images a la RDF triples (i.e. a very simplified version of the current DNA structures used in 2,3, and 4) should be found on the left corner, below the subtitle. IMHO, we don't need a SW flyer that looks like e.g. nr 4, but a very simple and expressible one. What do you think about the above proposal, which actually tries to summarize the received comments and of course my preferences? Best regards, Paula
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 09:03:50 UTC