- From: Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:15:02 -0400
- To: bnowack@appmosphere.com
- CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 04:19:51 UTC
To me (9) is the one which is less abstract and which conveys the values. (7) would be nice if the S was clearer. My preferred ones are 9, then 1, and then 7. Melli Benjamin Nowack wrote: > Hi all, > > During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the > list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now > I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s), > which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should > forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you > have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me, > but please do so asap.) > > Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can > then decide how to move on. > > Thanks in advance, > Benjamin > > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos > > -- > Benjamin Nowack > http://bnode.org/ > > > -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Melli Annamalai | Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.603.897.3218 Oracle Database Semantic Technologies One Oracle Drive, Nashua, NH 03063, USA Learn about Oracle Semantic Technologies: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 04:19:51 UTC