- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:26:56 -0400
- CC: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Leo Sauermann wrote: > Hi SWEOs, > > a small summary to the Portal-Discussion happening on the mailinglist > and in todays telco: > > Kingsley put it in very good words in the telco, saying that we should > focus on the deliverable we have at the moment: a SPARQL endpoint > which gathers data about the semantic web. (see wikipage [HowtoPublish]) > > Based on this deliverable, there is a second step that people who run > portals can take this data and integrate it into their portal (see > wikipage [PortalPlans] for our own planned portal) > > But anybody who runs already a portal, can integrate the data. And we > should still continue experiments on how the data can be visualized, > for example by copying it into a longwell browser. > Also, a colleague of mine offered to use his e-learning portal > software ALOE for SWEO, and Susie found somebody from California (?) > who may run such a portal. > > Anyway, a Portal will drag away much of our resources if we do it > ourselves (see [PortalPlans]) > We need to setup a server, write software, write a synchroniser or > ontology alignment stuff for the data, write, code, work, etc. > > It also appeared to me, that us SWEO members may not make this happen, > until somebody really says: I am going to do that. There is a chance > we can convince external people to do it (for a list of possible > candidates, see [DataSources], section "Information on Communities and > Outreach Organizations". > For example, the Semantic Web School Austria guys are such people we > may be able to convince. > > > [HowtoPublish] > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/HowtoPublish > [PortalPlans] > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/PortalPlans > [DataSources] > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/DataSources > > > > (Note to Kingsley: you wondered why longwell can't use the SPARQL > endpoint. In my knowledge, conventional longwell needs a whole dump of > the data to work, it was not possible to make longwell run with a > sparql endpoint, for the linked data project there was a hack by Chris > and you guys, but I don't know the details, and probably Danny doesn't > either, if Longwell can work on top of virtuoso. Longwell keeps its > own indizes and lucene stuff, it has always been standalone and > not-integrate-with-your-server. > Does Longwell now run directly on virtuoso? I remember Chris Bizer > saying that they wnated to do that and that you guys implemented > capable count() methods for longwell.....) Yes, we've implemented SPARQL Aggregates [1] [2] for a while now. This should, if used, enable Longwell perform faceted browsing against large data sets (even remotely). But remember, Longwell needs to talk SPARQL first (local or remote). Links: 1. http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparqlaggregate.html 2. http://www.openlinksw.com/weblog/oerling/?id=1162 Kingsley > > > It was Kingsley Idehen who said at the right time 22.07.2007 16:09 the > following words: >> >> Danny Ayers wrote: >>>> I am not convinced that Longwell will deliver the ease of >>>> production you >>>> espouse re. this portal effort. That said, I am extremely willing >>>> to be >>>> convinced otherwise, by seeing it accelerate the portal effort :-) >>> >>> Would I be right in thinking there's already a pile of data gathered? >>> (Sorry, not been following very well). If so, if you can point me to >>> an RDF/XML dump, I can have a play with Longwell on it, see what it >>> looks like... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Danny. >> Danny, >> >> See: >> >> 1. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/Info/ (main page) >> 2. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/WishList >> >> Which will reveal: >> 1. SPARQL Endpoint >> 2. iSPARQL QBE Endpoint >> 3. Sample Queries for Listing Graphs (in Dynamic Linked Data Page and >> SPARQL Query Definition forms) >> >> Note: The server will protect itself from a CONTRUCT aimed at dumping >> the entire Data Store via SPARQL. The plan was to produce a separate >> RDF Archive for al the contents of this store (as per "Open Data" >> best practices). >> >> > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 15:27:05 UTC