- From: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:45:10 -0400
- To: bnowack@appmosphere.com
- Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org, public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
Hi Benji, I agree that we could have made the process more streamlined in regards to both the logo and the brochure work. I hope that we have learnt from our experiences, so that we can be more effective and speedy going forwards. Lets discuss this during the call on Wednesday. Cheers, Susie Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosph ere.com> To Sent by: public-sweo-ig@w3.org public-sweo-ig-re cc quest@w3.org Subject [rant] let's change the process for 07/20/2007 03:59 visual material creation AM Please respond to bnowack@appmosphe re.com Hi, I'm sorry, but I think we should re-consider our approach to the outreach material creation process. We have a couple of people with design capabilities in this group, and we should either trust their skills or reject their offerings early. I mean, we started with the flyer in March, and we are not only wasting resources big time, but it's also frustrating for the people who volunteered in the first place. SWEO is going to need a lot of flyers and stuff, and I doubt Dunja and Paula are going to go through this again. I know that W3C means consensus etc, but in this case we are going to end up with a mediocre result. Or even worse, with no result at all: The comm team is currently working on a branding strategy for the semweb, i.e. they are most likely to hold back the flyer finalization until then, and after that we'll have to start from scratch (at least design-wise), missing another round of events where we could have distributed our material. Read this rant with a grain of salt as it's partly driven by my experience to create a logo but not being able to convince the group to go for something more abstract. (Guess what the comm team is going to use now..) This is not a "why not mine"-rant, the comm team proposals are way better, hands down, and our work wasn't a complete waste (creative work never is). But I suggest to let volunteering designers JFDI (I've seen webxcerpt flyers before, they have always been cool, definitely cool *enough* for SWEO), or to say "no, don't like your stuff at all". In the latter case, we stop blocking resources, and they still have the opportunity to create and distribute material w/o the W3C/SWEO blessing, which is still better than no output at all (that's at least the road I started to think taking recently). We could have three flyers by now, just from the wealth of ideas we had, but we desperately try to squeeze everything into a single flyer everyone is happy with, losing week after week. Who cares if one is pink as long as it gets the message across? Giving feedback is great, splitting hairs is not. I could go on with the portal. Calling something a "Design" when it looks like a W3C page is pretty close to an oxymoron. We just shouldn't do that (unless we say design is not important). Bottom line: Too many geeks just spoil the broth (and block the kitchen ;) Having said that, and to end with a positive tone, the branding coming from the comm team is going to be really cool, and it's not limited to the SemWeb effort. Creating stylish stuff based on it will be a treat, and with a bit of luck they may get the sign-off before mid-August. benji -- Benjamin Nowack http://bnode.org/
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 19:46:27 UTC