On 26/01/07, Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > [PW] couldn't have put it better myself. You'll see from Sam's blog that > it's plastered with Microformats. Why doesn't everyone on this list vote > RDFa <g> > Heh, I already did. Though truth be told I'm rather on the fence when it comes to RDFa because of the current ties to XHTML 2.0 (and QNames in attributes are ugly). On the other hand, browsers & a lot of people already support microformats as HTML and they can express perfectly good RDF given GRDDL (and eRDF, if need be). But I've been assured by people who's opinion I trust that RDFa is a Good Thing, so I try not to quibble ;-) Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 12:19:13 UTC