- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:00:36 +0100
- To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
All, I have updated the Wiki page http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Web_Developer_Outreach which now contains Susie's changes and some of Benjamin's suggestions and a short note as to the relationship, or lack thereof to the Semantic Web Challenge. I think it was useful to bring up the question of the SW Challenge, as thinking it over made it clearer in my mind that I don't want a competition, there are many other motivations among hackers to appeal to than the competitive aspect. Among them, pure altruism, the idea of having products of their labour on many people's machines, the silent recognition of their peers, the intellectual challenge, the idea of having Semantic Web succeed because of the intellectual investment they allready have in it (which is my main motivation for getting involved this way). By not announcing the winner, it doesn't really matter if I happen to submit the best proposals... ;-) I can't guarantee this will work, but I think it is worth a shot... So, phase 1 ends with Susie posting the questionnaire on the SW Activity page. Now for the plan for phase 2. I think we need a prominent page where we gather the short descriptions of all incoming projects, with links to a project page for each. On the project page, I think we should allow people to add their name and say what they can contribute to the project. Thus, a Wiki might be suitable. While I don't think we need to pronounce a winner, we should give recognition. Partly, blogging things we like can serve this purpose, but perhaps, at one point we might form a committee (of non-SWEO-people) to rank the projects that we feel have the best chance of succeeding. Once a project reaches releaseable code we should also put our weight behind it. Further thoughts? Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2007 16:29:52 UTC