RE: Community Project Results

Come to think of it, could we commission a video for RDF vs Microformats?
(just kidding :))

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Paul Walsh, Segala
> Sent: 26 February 2007 12:07
> To: 'Ivan Herman'
> Cc: 'Susie Stephens'; 'W3C SWEO IG'
> Subject: RE: Community Project Results
> 
> 
> I don't normally blog YouTube videos and I certainly never post them to a
> w3c list. But since this is a small team and this is a brilliant video to
> put you in a good mood... http://segala.com/blog/gates-vs-jobs-classic/
> 
> I loved the iHouse joke!
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
> > Sent: 26 February 2007 12:01
> > To: Paul Walsh, Segala
> > Cc: 'Susie Stephens'; 'W3C SWEO IG'
> > Subject: Re: Community Project Results
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Walsh, Segala wrote:
> > > Fantastic. Thanks to all those who voted for Search Thresher. This
will
> give
> > > me the nudge needed to create the roadmap for monthly build updates.
We
> will
> > > of course, include anything that can support the other projects.
> >
> > Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is just the small talk, this is not what you
> > promised...
> >
> > >
> > > Looks like I owe a few people a beer or two ;)
> > >
> >
> > now you are talking!!! :-)
> >
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >
> > > BTW, what's ironic and seriously dumb, is that I didn't get a chance
to
> > > vote! How stupid is that.
> > >
> > > Please accept our apology and belated regrets for not making the call
:(
> On
> > > the up side, I was talking about all this stuff to 11 seriously smart
> people
> > > at an Internet brainstorming session in London yesterday.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
> > >
> > > On
> > >
> > >>Behalf Of Susie Stephens
> > >>Sent: 21 February 2007 21:35
> > >>To: 'W3C SWEO IG'
> > >>Subject: Community Project Results
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>I've posted the results of the voting for community projects onto the
> > >>secure Wiki [1]. Please let me know if you can't access the page, and
> > >>I'll send you a copy of the PDF.
> > >>
> > >>As we discussed during today's call, I propose that we support the top
4
> > >>projects, as that seems like a reasonable number of projects to track,
> > >>and won't lead to too much fragmentation of effort. The top 4
proposals
> > >>are also all very different, which makes it a good point to draw the
> > >>line. I recommend that we invite people who submitted other project
> > >>proposals to become involved in the ones SWEO will be supporting.
> > >>
> > >>During the call we also discussed what SWEO supporting a project
means.
> > >>The thoughts that we had included having a SWEO use case, highlighting
> > >>the projects during conference presentations, giving demos where
> > >>possible, and general blogging. Other ideas included engaging
institutes
> > >>such as the Semantic Web School in Austria to train students using
these
> > >>projects so that we get more code. Another idea would be for SWEO to
> > >>host a hackathon.
> > >>
> > >>I'm looking forward to input from Kjetil as he's the task lead. :-)
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>
> > >>Susie
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>[1]
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/FrontPage?action=AttachFile&do=get
> > > &tar
> > >
> > >>get=Community_Project.pdf
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> > URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
> > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>

Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 12:08:16 UTC