- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:38:48 -0500
- CC: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, Uldis Bojars <captsolo@gmail.com>, John Breslin <john.breslin@deri.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: > Quick thoughts: I see the motivation re. reuse, but rather than trying > to use solely RSS 1.0 for the items, it might be better to use more > precise terms where they exist, as_well_as the RSS terms, e.g. > > <http://example.org/doc> a rss:item; a foaf:Document . > > For the taxo stuff, SKOS sounds a very good idea generally, though I > wouldn't be surprised if there were existing vocabs that could be used > for things like "tutorial" etc. > I'll cc Ian, he hangs around libraries... > > It might also be worth considering (perhaps redundantly again) the Tag > Ontology at > http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/tags/ > > Cheers, > Danny. > > > All, I think we can pull this off with SIOC with SKOS, FOAF, and RSS incorporated. When I mention SIOC please do not think Discussion Forums, Mailing Lists, Blogs etc.. This about a Generic Data Model for: 1. Item/Entity Containers (for collections) 2. Item/Entity Types 3. Item/Entity Properties Everything on the information gathering page falls into the People, Places, and Other Things model which can be expressed SIOC if we veer away from some of its "Web Content" orientation perceptions. As per usual, this is simply a perspective. My instincts are always oriented towards making everything co-exist unobtrusively :-) This is why excites me about RDF :-) Uldis/John: Please comment here as this is an opportune moment bearing in mind the activities going on in the SIOC realm. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:39:13 UTC