- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:27:43 -0000
- To: "'Danny Ayers'" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers > > On 15/02/07, Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com> wrote: > > > > I know this has come up before but I'll ask the question again. > > > > What is the W3C's position of the interpretation of the Semantic Web on > > wikipedia [1]. > > > > What is the rest of the group's thoughts about it? > > I was pleasantly surprised by the entry, most of it seems reasonably > accurate - very good to see the timbl quotes. > > > It's funny that everyone [2] knows that the SM is a W3C ambition, yet they > > decide to link to the ever so reliable wiki. > > Hmm, that might suggest the W3C's intro pages need work. That was the first thought that came into my head. > > > I could be cheeky and ensure it's update to include Content Labels. Or, is that cheeky?! > > I think it's entirely justified - there's a rather ill-informed > section on "Censorship, and privacy" which could do with a > counter-view, and Content Labels could add a good positive note. Glad you think so. Looks like we'll have to create a few pages on the subject to link to - looks like a project by itself. [snip] > > If anyone has a minute, the Layer Cake they've got is a little stale... Agree totally. Do we have any images with people, search tools, web pages etc?
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 20:27:57 UTC