- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:22:15 +0100
- To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <45D34547.7020007@w3.org>
are at: http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html. See also text version below Ivan [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Semantic Web EO IG Telco 14 Feb 2007 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-irc Attendees Present Susie, Dunja, Martin, Kjetil, Leo, Ivan, Wing, Lee, Paula, Orri, Benjamin, PaulW, Karen, Uldis Regrets Kingsley, Alistair, Pasquale Chair Susie Scribe Benjamin (bengee) Contents * [3]action item recap * [4]Community projects * [5]Info gathering * [6]Survey * [7]Use cases * [8]F2F in Stavanger * [9]Any other business * [10]Change of telco's timing * [11]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ action item recap scribe: pinging the DE/AT W3C office, no reply yet <ivan> ACTION: Susie to ping the w3c de/at office again [recorded in [12]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action01] scribe: re brochures for www2007 <Dunitschka> yea i did scribe: jeff <leobard> bengee: Alistair Duke had an action item to sum up his use case scribe: alistair making progress on his use ase action item ... several case study contacts are being worked on (nokia?, ontotext, ..) Community projects nxt: kjetil on community projects <kjetilk> [13]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Link ingOpenData [13] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData nxt: linked data got lots of cimmitments commitments even <kjetilk> [14]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAF Whitelisting [14] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAFWhitelisting foaf whitelisting as well <kjetilk> [15]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Medi aWidgets [15] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/MediaWidgets scribe: a new one: media widgets <kjetilk> [16]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Hist oryBookForTomorrow [16] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/HistoryBookForTomorrow the 4 projects just pasted by kjetilk have commitments <leobard> question asked: what should we do now given the projects at hand? ivan: asks for kjetil's next step plans <leobard> kjetilk: the data projects are promising kjetilk: try to make projects proceed somehow, maybe give some exposure already susie: maybe the rest of the group could have a look at the list and collect some comments wrt chance to being successful etc <leobard> susie: next week we can select which project we support ivan: linked data seems to have the largest impact, but may not really match the idea of convincing outsiders, as its more data oriented, not really app-focused <leobard> ivan: the "linking open data" project's value is only for semantic web geeks. <LeeF> +1 to ivan's take on the projects ivan: on the other hand: an excellent project that may be a prerequisite for other ones <leobard> ivan: we want to have several projects we give publicity <leobard> ivan: not only one or two projects <wing> nice, kjetilk kjetilk: agrees with ivan that his project is, without being biased, is more useful for the showing side ... ;) susie: there will probably a list of several projects (not just one) *be* a list of <kjetilk> +1 scribe: adds a personal suggestion wrt to the community projects ... that the group creates some sort of voting ... maybe anonymously <kjetilk> +1 for trusting Susie susie: maybe just send it to her and she will put it in a spreadsheet ... general agreement PaulaP: whether voting is one-per-person only susie: any input should be welcome Info gathering leobard: not much progress on infogathering, but looks pretty done for the first step ... will update the wiki pages and pings the list for a review <Zakim> kjetilk, you wanted to say that I might not be here next week Ivan and Kjetilk will probably not be available next week Survey Karen ad wing on enterprise survey, candidates for use cases scribe: not much news, but positive feedback from within w3c so far (if I got that right) Use cases susie pinged several companies (pfizer?, agfa, ) for use case (or case studies?) examples agfa's jos de roo has already written some things <leobard> susie: we received a use case description, but it was too scientific scribe: could use that as a starting point ... not response from DigitalHarbour yet ... ora lassila responded for nokia ... there is a project within nokia, but he'll have to forward the request ... BT ... EPA ... work that could be useful, would be interested ... in general: pretty positive feedback scribe: wants to make sure that the ourput is going to be tailored to groups like CIOs, CTOs, etc <LeeF> Joost Ivan suggests to add joost to the list <PaulW> [17]http://www.joost.com/ [17] http://www.joost.com/ <kjetilk> [18]http://opensource.joost.com/libb/ [18] http://opensource.joost.com/libb/ <kjetilk> libby miller <uldis_> danbri is also working with asemantics <scribe> ACTION: bengee to find right person within joost to contact for use case / case study [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action02] <kjetilk> [20]http://www.leosimons.com/2006/rdf-at-the-venice-project.html [20] http://www.leosimons.com/2006/rdf-at-the-venice-project.html kjetilk: the practical problems they had could be interesting yeah susie: maybe dajobe from yahoo! ... swh from garlik <leobard> susie: dajobe used rdf for the food website, thats a good use case scribe: probably on the 23rd of april ... currently looking into accommodation etc Leobard asks for use case format Susie: rather high-level, maybe even "glossy-style" ... about 2 pages in length <wing> +1 to millions of dollars Susie: "how the semweb made me rich" <leobard> ontoware Leobard: maybe contact even more companies (e.g. vendors) F2F in Stavanger scribe: probably on the 23rd of april ... currently looking into accommodation etc Any other business next: AOB ... upcoming and past events ... interesting demos at cambridge meeting ... suggestion to move the call to some earlier time to better suit west coast US, and Asia ... and GRDDLers <leobard> I have something Leobard: wonders if anything came out of dialog with semweb school AT already Susie: still communicating Change of telco's timing Proposal: move it one hour earlier <kjetilk> +1 <ivan> +1 <PaulaP> +1 <Karen> +1 <PaulW> +1 +1 works for me <wing> +1 , either way <martind> +1 <PaulW> +2 <LeeF> 10am? so early! <wing> sorry, LeeF <leobard> I have a question about semantic-web.at ... decision: to change the sweo call time to be one hour earlier Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: bengee to find right person within joost to contact for use case / case study [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: Susie to ping the w3c de/at office again [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([24]CVS log) $Date: 2007/02/14 17:20:21 $ [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:22:46 UTC