- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:22:15 +0100
- To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <45D34547.7020007@w3.org>
are at:
http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html. See also text version below
Ivan
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Semantic Web EO IG Telco
14 Feb 2007
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-irc
Attendees
Present
Susie, Dunja, Martin, Kjetil, Leo, Ivan, Wing, Lee, Paula,
Orri, Benjamin, PaulW, Karen, Uldis
Regrets
Kingsley, Alistair, Pasquale
Chair
Susie
Scribe
Benjamin (bengee)
Contents
* [3]action item recap
* [4]Community projects
* [5]Info gathering
* [6]Survey
* [7]Use cases
* [8]F2F in Stavanger
* [9]Any other business
* [10]Change of telco's timing
* [11]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
action item recap
scribe: pinging the DE/AT W3C office, no reply yet
<ivan> ACTION: Susie to ping the w3c de/at office again [recorded in
[12]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action01]
scribe: re brochures for www2007
<Dunitschka> yea i did
scribe: jeff
<leobard> bengee: Alistair Duke had an action item to sum up his use
case
scribe: alistair making progress on his use ase action item
... several case study contacts are being worked on (nokia?,
ontotext, ..)
Community projects
nxt: kjetil on community projects
<kjetilk>
[13]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Link
ingOpenData
[13]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData
nxt: linked data got lots of cimmitments
commitments even
<kjetilk>
[14]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAF
Whitelisting
[14]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAFWhitelisting
foaf whitelisting as well
<kjetilk>
[15]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Medi
aWidgets
[15]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/MediaWidgets
scribe: a new one: media widgets
<kjetilk>
[16]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/Hist
oryBookForTomorrow
[16]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/HistoryBookForTomorrow
the 4 projects just pasted by kjetilk have commitments
<leobard> question asked: what should we do now given the projects
at hand?
ivan: asks for kjetil's next step plans
<leobard> kjetilk: the data projects are promising
kjetilk: try to make projects proceed somehow, maybe give some
exposure already
susie: maybe the rest of the group could have a look at the list and
collect some comments wrt chance to being successful etc
<leobard> susie: next week we can select which project we support
ivan: linked data seems to have the largest impact, but may not
really match the idea of convincing outsiders, as its more data
oriented, not really app-focused
<leobard> ivan: the "linking open data" project's value is only for
semantic web geeks.
<LeeF> +1 to ivan's take on the projects
ivan: on the other hand: an excellent project that may be a
prerequisite for other ones
<leobard> ivan: we want to have several projects we give publicity
<leobard> ivan: not only one or two projects
<wing> nice, kjetilk
kjetilk: agrees with ivan that his project is, without being biased,
is more useful for the showing side
... ;)
susie: there will probably a list of several projects (not just one)
*be* a list of
<kjetilk> +1
scribe: adds a personal suggestion wrt to the community projects
... that the group creates some sort of voting
... maybe anonymously
<kjetilk> +1 for trusting Susie
susie: maybe just send it to her and she will put it in a
spreadsheet
... general agreement
PaulaP: whether voting is one-per-person only
susie: any input should be welcome
Info gathering
leobard: not much progress on infogathering, but looks pretty done
for the first step
... will update the wiki pages and pings the list for a review
<Zakim> kjetilk, you wanted to say that I might not be here next
week
Ivan and Kjetilk will probably not be available next week
Survey
Karen ad wing on enterprise survey, candidates for use cases
scribe: not much news, but positive feedback from within w3c so far
(if I got that right)
Use cases
susie pinged several companies (pfizer?, agfa, ) for use case (or
case studies?) examples
agfa's jos de roo has already written some things
<leobard> susie: we received a use case description, but it was too
scientific
scribe: could use that as a starting point
... not response from DigitalHarbour yet
... ora lassila responded for nokia
... there is a project within nokia, but he'll have to forward the
request
... BT
... EPA
... work that could be useful, would be interested
... in general: pretty positive feedback
scribe: wants to make sure that the ourput is going to be tailored
to groups like CIOs, CTOs, etc
<LeeF> Joost
Ivan suggests to add joost to the list
<PaulW> [17]http://www.joost.com/
[17] http://www.joost.com/
<kjetilk> [18]http://opensource.joost.com/libb/
[18] http://opensource.joost.com/libb/
<kjetilk> libby miller
<uldis_> danbri is also working with asemantics
<scribe> ACTION: bengee to find right person within joost to contact
for use case / case study [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action02]
<kjetilk>
[20]http://www.leosimons.com/2006/rdf-at-the-venice-project.html
[20] http://www.leosimons.com/2006/rdf-at-the-venice-project.html
kjetilk: the practical problems they had could be interesting
yeah
susie: maybe dajobe from yahoo!
... swh from garlik
<leobard> susie: dajobe used rdf for the food website, thats a good
use case
scribe: probably on the 23rd of april
... currently looking into accommodation etc
Leobard asks for use case format
Susie: rather high-level, maybe even "glossy-style"
... about 2 pages in length
<wing> +1 to millions of dollars
Susie: "how the semweb made me rich"
<leobard> ontoware
Leobard: maybe contact even more companies (e.g. vendors)
F2F in Stavanger
scribe: probably on the 23rd of april
... currently looking into accommodation etc
Any other business
next: AOB
... upcoming and past events
... interesting demos at cambridge meeting
... suggestion to move the call to some earlier time to better suit
west coast US, and Asia
... and GRDDLers
<leobard> I have something
Leobard: wonders if anything came out of dialog with semweb school
AT already
Susie: still communicating
Change of telco's timing
Proposal: move it one hour earlier
<kjetilk> +1
<ivan> +1
<PaulaP> +1
<Karen> +1
<PaulW> +1
+1 works for me
<wing> +1 , either way
<martind> +1
<PaulW> +2
<LeeF> 10am? so early!
<wing> sorry, LeeF
<leobard> I have a question about semantic-web.at ...
decision: to change the sweo call time to be one hour earlier
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: bengee to find right person within joost to contact
for use case / case study [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Susie to ping the w3c de/at office again [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version 1.127
([24]CVS log)
$Date: 2007/02/14 17:20:21 $
[23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 17:22:46 UTC