Re: Semantic Web Activity page use case

Paul Walsh, Segala wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
> Sent: 09 February 2007 13:08
> 
> 
>>[PW] This is very good to know. David is going to propose 2 projects;
>>contentlabel.org to create new codes of conduct using POWDER (feel free to
>>hit me every time I say Content Labels on this list ;))
>>
>>The second will be for Browser extensions/plug-ins to demonstrate how
> 
> POWDER
> 
>>(and other Semantic stuff) can benefit end users. This is where your
> 
> comment
> 
>>is useful. At present searchthresher.com is not Segala branded as we
> 
> wanted
> 
>>to get something up very quickly. However we're going to launch a new site
>>and pull the extension in with it. I won't waste time doing this if I
> 
> think
> 
>>there's a strong possibility of getting this onto the project list.
>>Likewise, I don't want to pull the blog down if it's not going to make it
>>onto the list.
>>
>>I'm more than happy to have the extension branded with the same brand as I
>>intend to create for POWDER/Content Labels.
>>
> 
> 
> There is a difference between projects done by member of an IG/WG on
> behalf of the IG/WG and what goes on the 'central' Web pages like the
> activity page. The latter would/could reflect a strong backing of W3C as
> an organization, and that is what I try to avoid. For those pages, I
> would be probably more catholic than the pope:-)
> 
> [PW] Not sure I get what you're saying exactly Ivan :) contentlabel.org
> isn't a W3C project, nor is the extension building to ready Content
> Labels/POWDER. Is this a good thing?
>   

Yes:-) I think we are getting into a discussion of nuances... There is
no problem with what you do, regardless of whether you are or not a
member. It is only the 'central' W3C pages that are sensitive in this sense.

Ivan


> Cheers
> Paul
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:54:59 UTC