Re: SWEO is in the news :-)

Paul,

I am not sure what exactly is your question. Is it to give CC license
for the results of the projects?

There is also a W3C licence for software (which is, afaik, very liberal)
but I am not sure it is 100% the same as one of the CC licences. I know
our legal guys are looking at combining these two, and I must admit that
I do not really know what the subtle differences are. I *really* prefer
to leave that to my legally minded colleagues...

Ivan

Paul Walsh, Segala wrote:
> Thanks Susie.
> 
> Reading the article, we could publish a vocabulary for creative commons.
> Should be really easy. I was talking to David earlier about how to get
> better adoption. It's kinda like productising a technology as it's easier to
> sell a product and it is a concept. PEGI for example, has agreed that it
> will use Content Labels for online games rating. So, rather than wait for
> them to do something, we'll probably create the labels for them.
> 
> What do you think about the creative commons license? It is after all, a
> form of conformance claim.
> 
> Look forward to your feedback.
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Susie Stephens
> Sent: 07 February 2007 15:09
> To: 'W3C SWEO IG'
> Subject: SWEO is in the news :-)
> 
> 
> There's an article about SWEO in content wire. :-)
> http://www.content-wire.com/FreshPicks/Index.cfm?ccs=86&cs=4391
> 
> Susie
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf