- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:29:57 -0000
- To: "'Kjetil Kjernsmo'" <kjetilk@opera.com>, <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Doh. Ok so mass adoption hasn't happened. Not because I didn't know about it, but because some of my colleagues didn't know about it either. Why do you think that is? Is there a use case to create a Content Label for it still in your opinion? Remember, that Content Labels are likely to replace PICS if we manage to get the Charter signed off. Furthermore, Content Labels could be sold as a new implementation that will work better... productisation. Cheers Paul -----Original Message----- From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kjetil Kjernsmo Sent: 07 February 2007 15:26 To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: SWEO is in the news :-) On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:14, Paul Walsh, Segala wrote: > Reading the article, we could publish a vocabulary for creative > commons. That's existed for many years allready: http://creativecommons.org/technology/metadata/ It is also in quite widespread use, it would be really nice to have some useful applications around it. Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date: 06/02/2007 17:52
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:30:13 UTC