- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:32:29 +0100
- To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
On Monday 05 February 2007 18:25, Ivan Herman wrote: > Yes, that paragraph has been there for a long time; it is actually a > quote from a presentation or an interview from Tim. As far as I can > judge, microformats did not exist when that paragraph was put there. Right. > The question is of course the audience. When you say that *this* use > case can be implemented by microformats, that means that you already > are way ahead of the crowd and you *know* what the usage of the web > of data is. [...] > (And if people would also make an association with > microformats, that by itself is not so bad. In some way, I regard > them to be part of the Semantic Web...) I too regard microformats as part of the Semantic Web, but I would think that W3C pages address more technical people than complete novices to web technology. And I meet a lot of people these days who thinks that microformats would solve pretty much everything that is interesting with Semantic Web, which is far from what I think, and I think that paragraph reinforces that impression and thus underlines the impression they have that the W3C is completely irrelevant and that whatever we're doing here can be safely ignored. Which I would think is a bad thing... Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 14:32:43 UTC