- From: Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:17:05 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
We're changing the ranking system for question 10, so everything should now be good. :-) Susie Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Susie Stephens wrote on 12/18/2006 03:10:51 PM: > > >> I've embedded my thoughts below for the areas where Ivan has said that >> he is looking for feedback. >> >> All other comments are very welcome. :-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Susie >> >> >> >> >> Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> I made a bunch of changes, documented in separate mails. Here are the >>> items which I would like to get agreement on before doing anything: >>> >>> Lee: >>> >>> Question 10: I don't understand this question as worded. Why do we >>> > care > >>> about the survey taker's opinion on this vis a vis the actual nature >>> > of > >>> who the decision markers / influencers are? >>> >>> >> The goal of the question is to get a better understanding as to who >> exactly the decision makers / influencers are. That way we can tailor >> our collateral to the key people. Lee: Does this answer your question? >> > > That's what I had assumed on reading the question, but the "Don't mind" > and "Don't want" answer choices thoroughly convinced me that the question > was really asking "Which people in your organization do *you think* should > have most influence on decisions about whether to use Semantic Web > technologies?" Which seemed silly. You're right that the question is OK as > worded -- it's the answer choices that thoroughly threw me for a loop. > > Lee > > >
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 22:18:45 UTC