RE: On the messaging issues (was also the RDF/XML discussion on the call)

...yes! 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman
Sent: 05 December 2006 11:11
To: Davies,NJ,John,CXR3 R
Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: On the messaging issues (was also the RDF/XML discussion on
the call)

no...

john.nj.davies@bt.com wrote:
>>In my core tutorial that I use:
>>http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/CorePresentations/RDFTutorial/
> 
> 
> Very nice tutorial - has it been "sweo'ed" in del.icio.us yet?
> 
> John.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman
> Sent: 05 December 2006 10:50
> To: Kingsley Idehen
> Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: On the messaging issues (was also the RDF/XML discussion 
> on the call)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>Focal point being, that existing and future collateral should be 
>>cognizant of the tendency to inadvertently skew the RDF Data Model 
>>with an over emphasis on RDF/XML. In short, more N3/Turtle examples 
>>should accompany RDF/XML examples when assembling, or editing 
>>existing, introductory presentation material about the RDF Data Model
> 
> etc..
> 
> 
> I agree. In my core tutorial that I use:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/CorePresentations/RDFTutorial/
> 
> I have all my examples in RDF/XML *and* Turtle as well as a graph.
> (Sometimes only a graph.)
> 
> I.
> 
> 
> 
>>I really want to be crystal clear about the point I am trying to make 
>>about the messaging and the use of the Layer Cake to guide the 
>>construction of said messaging.
>>
>>
>>>Lee
>>>
>>>  
>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 11:28:29 UTC