- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:15:46 +0100
- To: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
- Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@oracle.com>, W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <45740362.9090903@w3.org>
Thanks for your reply Libby... and have fun with the venice project! Ivan Libby Miller wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Ivan Herman wrote: > > >>Libby, >> >>long time no seen:-( It seems that @semantics keeps you busy! > > > I'm mostly now at http://www.theveniceproject.com/ and that's eating my > time. Sorry not to have replied earlier Ivan. > > >>Here is why I contact you at this time. You may know that the SW >>Education and Outreach Interest Group [1] has just started. One of the >>things that we are contemplating (and just gathering information) is to >>the list of SW applications (not only demos). >> >>Things have been done in the past, mostly with your help and >>participation. I know about what you did on the SW BPD group[2] which >>then led to [3]. The latter also seems to list SW tools, too; in this >>sense there is also an overlap with, say[4]. But I am not really sure I >>have a clear image of the current status of [2][3], your plan, etc. > > > no plans as such, actually I was surprised it was still up... :-) > > Feel free to duplicate / take the data (which isn't mine anyway) and do it > better. > > >>It is clearly *not* the goal of the SWEO IG to duplicate work and ignore >>what others have done. Do you think you can tell us about your >>experiences, plans, current status, etc, where do you think others could >>do better, worse? It would help us greatly in starting... > > > I don't have much to say - it was very easy to set up the software, and it > worked perfectly well, except that DOAP's use of urls for classification > made facets based on that unweildy to render and dates really need to be > date ranges - something that a sparql-based version of SWED would perhaps > solve. > > Editorisalised lists of software and projects are very boring to maintain, > which is why I think the DOAP-based approach is a good one. > > all the best > > Libby > > >>Thanks >> >>Cheers >> >>Ivan >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ >>[2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebDOAPBulletinBoard >>[3] http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/adtf/ >>[4] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebTools >> >> >>-- >> >>Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html >>FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 11:15:37 UTC