Re: [SKOS] editorial comment: basic version info in RDF documents?

Antoine,

I am happy to add it to the text and update it on the site, but I would
prefer if you gave me the text to be added...

Thanks

Ivan

Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I got this comment from my colleague Lourens van der Meij:
> 
>> And I think it would help if skos.rdf contained some more information
>> that it indeed is a new version that
>> reflects the standard (I suppose there used to be another version up
>> to a couple of months ago.)
> 
> 
> I think this makes sense: we (and the previous SW Best Practices group)
> have issued quite some versions of the RDF files, which are now
> circulating here and there. It would be nice to allow developpers to
> identify for sure that what they get is the right vocabulary.
> Would it be possible to add some editorial note to all our RDF
> vocabulaires [1,2,3] saying that these are representing our Aug 18 version?
> 
> Note that I'm not asking for a complete versioning system: just an
> XML-commented text (using <!-- -->) pointing to the time-stamped HTML
> documents on the W3C site would be enough as a basic solution, I think.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos.rdf
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos-xl.rdf [3]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos-owl1-dl.rdf
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf