- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:07:28 +0200
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:30:22PM +0100, Sean Bechhofer wrote: >>>> The HTML tables [1] do not show the rdfs:labels used in the RDF >>>> expression [2] - perhaps an oversight? (See also [3].) >>> >>> We never had the labels in those tables. I guess strictly speaking we >>> should include these in Reference as the RDF schema is stated as >>> being a "normative subset of SKOS Reference". >>> >>> Does this impact on today's resolution? I would consider this to be >>> an minor editorial change. >> >> I also think it is a minor editorial change - it would simply >> incorporate information from the (normative) RDF/XML variant >> that was previously omitted in the (normative) HTML variant. > > Indeed -- there's no new information here (and it fixes the > inconsistency cited above). This is now done in the working draft. I'd > appreciate someone casting a quick pair of eyes over this to check it. It seems ok to me at first sight, except for [1], where the label of hasTopConcept is said to be "label" Cheers, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/skos.html#hasTopConcept > > Sean > > -- > Sean Bechhofer > School of Computer Science > University of Manchester > sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk > http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 19:08:02 UTC