[SKOS] Remaining steps to CR

Alistair, Sean, Ralph,

As we discussed on Tuesday [1], favorable responses from the
i18n group remain the final obstacle towards proceeding with our
CR transition request of 7 January [2].

Have we received those responses? Has Addison responded to
Antoine [3] about [4] and to Alistair [5]? Alistair agreed
to changes proposed by Richard [6,7], which would need to be
incorporated into the draft that is published as CR. Alistair
responded to other points made by Richard, and Richard seems
satisfied [8] (though he asks how the WG will ensure that
remaining issues be eventually handled - a good question). Can
we now close Issue 191 [10]?

It looks to me like these latest exchanges do clarify
the remaining issues. Do you agree?

If so, I'd like to ask Alistair to confirm the following
bundle of resources for transition to CR [9] when they 
have been corrected as per [5-9].

> I submit the following bundle of resources for transition of the SKOS
> Reference to CR:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/Overview.html -- SKOS Reference
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos.html -- SKOS Namespace Document (HTML)
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos.rdf -- SKOS Namespace Document (RDF)
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos-xl.html -- SKOS XL Namespace Document (HTML)
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos-xl.rdf -- SKOS XL Namespace Document (RDF)
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/issues.html -- SKOS Disposition of Comments
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/extras.css -- style for SKOS Reference
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/extras.js -- script for SKOS Reference
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/issues.css -- style for SKOS DisCo

As for the Primer, Antoine could you please post a link to
the latest version? I see Issue 189 is still open [11], but I
believe we resolved to approve Antoine's draft response [12].
Unless I am overlooking something, Antoine, could you please
close this?

If I properly understand the process, and if everyone agrees on
the above, Ralph can take it from there.

Tom

[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-swd-minutes.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JanMar/0000.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0017.html
[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090224.html#secpref
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0020.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0030.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0029.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0024.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Dec/0077.html
[10] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/191
[11] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/189
[12] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-swd-minutes.html#item02


-- 
Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 13:02:13 UTC