- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:27:52 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: 'Alistair Miles' <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, public-swd-wg@w3.org, "'Ralph R. Swick'" <swick@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Alistair wrote: > > ... I hope that > > best practices on how to choose between variants to populate labels > > for primary language subtags would be dealt with by the community of > > practice. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:52:30PM -0000, Richard Ishida wrote: > My main concern is how your WG will ensure that these topics > do eventually get picked up for discussion and become the > subject of a separate note, as you suggest, rather than this > discussion evaporating. Do you have a process for that? Because > I think these are quite important things to address for SKOS and > related technologies to provide solutions that will work in an > interoperable way. Hi Richard, To clarify about process: the working group has extended its charter in order to bring SKOS to Recommendation. If all goes well, this could happen in June, after which the working group will close. So for the WG itself, there is no process for following through on these and many other areas where a need to extend SKOS has been recognized, though we are doing our best to lay down an orderly record of issues and discussion threads which other groups could take as a starting point. How the standardization of extensions to SKOS might be managed in the community of practice after the WG closes is indeed an important and timely question. Tom -- Tom Baker W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 19:28:48 UTC