- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:04:00 +0200
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <l.svensson@d-nb.de>
- CC: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Dear Lars, Thanks for the comment! By 'the text', are you refering to the sentence > if "animals" is broader than "mammals" and "mammals" is broader than "cats", then "animals" is broader than "cats". ? If yes, then it's intented this way: the sentence has an informal flavor. Plus, it might be confusing for readers already puzzled by the label and 'direction' of skos:broader. 'if "animals" is skos:broader than "mammals"' may indeed be quickly read as an RDF triple (animal skos:broader mammals) which does not correspond to the actual situation. I hope this answers your concern, Antoine > Hi all, > > In Sec 4.5 Transitive Hierarchies, you use the property ex:broader when > explaining the example 4.5.1. Since you use skos:broader in the figure, > shouldn't it be skos:broader in the text, too? > > Thanks, > > Lars >
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 13:04:31 UTC