- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:49:46 +0100
- To: Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 10 Jul 2009, at 12:23, Alistair Miles wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:35:37PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> We discussed the I18N Core comment (below) on today's telecon >> [1] and resolved the following: >> >> RESOLUTION: We (a) modify the example(s) in 6.5.4 to be >> syntactically conformant to BCP 47 and (b) offer to add a phrase >> such as "note that such use of private subtags to transmit data >> unrelated to language or language choice may violate BCP 47" >> contingent on Alistair and Sean's agreeing > > I'm happy with this. I'm also happy with this. > >> We also discussed Issue 25 [2] - whether the abstract should say >> "documented with various types of note" (as now) or "documented >> with various types of notes". I think we actually discussed >> this at one point, and I vaguely recall agreeing with Sean that >> "types of note" is okay but would not object if Sean prefers to >> make the change. Hence our resolution: >> >> RESOLUTION: Sean to decide on issue-225 Personally, I'm happy with the text as it stands. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 17:50:25 UTC