W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: [SKOS] Re: ISSUE-224 [was: Agenda - 2009-07-07 SWD telecon]

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:49:46 +0100
Message-Id: <BDA56F4C-3469-46CC-849D-48A45B0B26CA@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@gmail.com>

On 10 Jul 2009, at 12:23, Alistair Miles wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:35:37PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> We discussed the I18N Core comment (below) on today's telecon
>> [1] and resolved the following:
>>    RESOLUTION: We (a) modify the example(s) in 6.5.4 to be
>>    syntactically conformant to BCP 47 and (b) offer to add a phrase
>>    such as "note that such use of private subtags to transmit data
>>    unrelated to language or language choice may violate BCP 47"
>>    contingent on Alistair and Sean's agreeing
> I'm happy with this.

I'm also happy with this.
>> We also discussed Issue 25 [2] - whether the abstract should say
>> "documented with various types of note" (as now) or "documented
>> with various types of notes".  I think we actually discussed
>> this at one point, and I vaguely recall agreeing with Sean that
>> "types of note" is okay but would not object if Sean prefers to
>> make the change.  Hence our resolution:
>>    RESOLUTION: Sean to decide on issue-225

Personally, I'm happy with the text as it stands.


Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 17:50:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:57 UTC