- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:49:37 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 7 Jul 2009, at 14:15, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hello, > > Regrets from me for today's telecon. > Input on some agenda points follows. > >> ============================================ >> 2. SKOS >> -- Comments >> 2009-07-06. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0001.html >> 2009-06-29. Addison Phillips on I18N issue >> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jun/0040.html > > > Re. this issue, I can live with the option where we would recommend > to use pref and altLabels with literals that have no language tag. > Even though this is clearly less flexible (e.g. not being compatible > with the country code example). As I understand the comment, the problem is specifically with example 22 rather than the use of language tags with pref and altLabel, so I'm not quite sure I understand this, Antoine. Do you mean recommend for *this particular situation*, or in general? > I also volunteer to start a discussion with the i18n people on > whether the use of private use tags is merely frowned upon, or if > they would still formally object if our examples were just made > compatible with the syntax for private use tags. That would be great -- thanks Antoine. > I indeed understand that syntactially wrong tags are to be avoided > in the rec. But if we make explicit that we're really not expecting > the use of private tags to be common, then maybe the i18n would be > happier on this specific point (which is different from the > syntactic validity, again). Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 14:50:14 UTC