- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:17:00 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Note that the second comment raised by Magnus in [1] raises the issue of the sanity-checking the SKOS ontology at [2]. I have the feeling that even though this document is crucial for the Recommendation, we (*as a group*) have not scrutinized it as thoroughly as we did for the Reference. Is this feeling right? If yes, I'd propose we take action on this, by having one or two persons browse and validate it. I don't know how this should formally handled with. But I'd be happy to volunteer to make a small review, if need be. Cheers, Antoine [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2009Feb/0014.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/skos.rdf
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2009 14:17:29 UTC