SKOS: COMMENT: Re: [Mulgara-general] Rules and SKOS

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> · Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:53:52 +0100

This is very interesting.

This is also a very good example of just how the introduction of  
broaderTransitive and narrowerTransitive   may, on further reflection,  
turn out to be, upon further review, differently  weighted in the  
balancing of factors than, on ones initial impression, may have  
seemed, or rather, the converse.

Or, to quote Professor Jane Greenberg, SKOS is neither Simple, or a  
K.O.S.

Simon

On Sep 29, 2008, at 1:19 PM, David Wood wrote:

>
> This is awesome, Paul!  Thanks!
>
> I'm copying the SKOS list so they know about it.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Sep 28, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Paul Gearon wrote:
>
>> I've recently had to do a little bit of work with SKOS and Rules, and
>> I thought it might be worth pointing out to people.
>>
>> You'll find a description on how to use rules in the Wiki at:
>> http://mulgara.org/trac/wiki/Rules
>>
>> I've also included a file for partial SKOS entailments (partial,
>> because I don't have collection support yet). This is attached to and
>> described in:
>> http://mulgara.org/trac/wiki/SKOS
>>
>> The SKOS rules may be informative for anyone wanting to use SKOS, or
>> rules in general. Note that almost all the work is done in the 6  
>> rules
>> at the bottom of the file. Everything else is done with OWL
>> vocabulary.  (There are 4 extra rules, some of which may be  
>> redundant,
>> plus a 5th that is necessary due to a strange requirement in SKOS,  
>> but
>> each of these are exceptional, rather than the norm).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mulgara-general mailing list
>> Mulgara-general@mulgara.org
>> http://mulgara.org/mailman/listinfo/mulgara-general
>
>