- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:32:55 -0400
- To: "SWD Working Group" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for the detailed read Antoine. On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: >> The skos:note, skos:changeNote, skos:definition, skos:example, >> skos:historyNote, skos:scopeNote, skos:editorialNote were changed from being >> of type rdfs:Property to owl:ObjectProperty. > > That should not be true, as they can have any kind of object, including > datatyped literals... Am I reading the definition the note properties wrong in the RDF for SKOS2008 [1]. Also the Reference has this chunk of text [2]. So it seems to be intentional, and not an oversight. """ Note that the basis for the SKOS data model is the RDF-compatible model-theoretic semantics for OWL Full [OWL-SEMANTICS]. Under the OWL Full semantics, the class of OWL datatype properties is a sub-class of the class of OWL object properties [OWL-REFERENCE]. Therefore, stating that the SKOS documentation properties are all instances of owl:ObjectProperty is the most general statement that can be made, and is consistent with all three usage patterns described in the SKOS Primer. """ >> SKOS2008 includes some new vocabulary elements for mapping concepts from >> one >> concept scheme to another: skos:exactMatch, skos:broadMatch, >> skos:narrowMatch, skos:relatedMatch. > > There is also skos:closeMatch While I see the definition for skos:closeMatch in the Reference [3] I don't actually see that in the RDF for SKOS2008 [1]--which is why my vdiff utility didn't pick it up I guess :-) Perhaps the HTML and the RDF are out of sync? Thanks for catching it! //Ed [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080609/skos.rdf [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L1917 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L4186
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 18:33:32 UTC