Re: SKOS Comment (various) [ISSUE-174]

Dear Jeremy

Thank you for your comments [1,ISSUE-174]:

Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]:

14) 10.6.5A missing discussion of Cycles involving skos:closeMatch.  
or perhaps larger substantive)
Possible text:
<A> skos:exactMatch <B>
<A> skos:closeMatch <A> (via S45, S46 and S42).
implementations must be able to cope with cycles in skos:closeMatch.

This perhaps calls into question the stance in other sections where  
of other properties is left open as an implementation variability.


Text as suggested has been included. We have, however, made no other  
substantial change to the document in response to your comment. The  
Working Group propose to close this issue. I hope you can live with  


	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles


Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:08:00 UTC