- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:03:56 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear Jeremy Thank you for your comments [1,ISSUE-174]: Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]: 14) 10.6.5A missing discussion of Cycles involving skos:closeMatch. (editorial or perhaps larger substantive) Possible text: [[ Since <A> skos:exactMatch <B> entails <A> skos:closeMatch <A> (via S45, S46 and S42). implementations must be able to cope with cycles in skos:closeMatch. ]] This perhaps calls into question the stance in other sections where reflexivity of other properties is left open as an implementation variability. ------------------------------------------------------------- Text as suggested has been included. We have, however, made no other substantial change to the document in response to your comment. The Working Group propose to close this issue. I hope you can live with this. Cheers, Sean Bechhofer Alistair Miles [ISSUE-174] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/174 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:08:00 UTC