Re: SKOS Comment (various) [ISSUE-167]

Dear Jeremy

Thank you for your comments [1,ISSUE-167]:

6) editorial clarification (?)

The last sentence in section 4.6.3 I read as:

"An application may reject such data but is not required to."

which I think is a clearer wording if that is the intent. If that  
isn't the
intent then further wordsmithing may be necessary.

-------------------------------------------------------------

This is the intent and we have clarified as suggested. The Working  
Group propose to close this issue. I hope you are happy with this.

Cheers,

	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles

[ISSUE-167] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/167
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html


--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:08:03 UTC