- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-179: Last Call Comment: PFWG: Lexical Labels http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/179 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS Raised by Al Gilman on behalf of PFWG in [1]: """ Re Section 5. Lexical Labels The motivation for the Integrity Conditions listed in section 5.4. (S13 and S14) is not clear. They appear to be overly constraining and badly aligned with the architecture of distributed systems, where labels could come from different sources and authors, and where redundancies may arise. Why is it okay to have no preferred label defined, but it is a clash to have the same string as preferred and alternate label? A SKOS application should be able to deal with situations where there are competing preferred labels, or one label being redundantly defined as “preferred” and “alternate”. These situations should not make the SKOS application fail. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0063.html
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 09:54:16 UTC