- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 21:15:48 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-148: Last Call Comment: Irreflexive and noncyclical hierarchies http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/148 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]: """ While it makes good sense to have an abstract base to handle unexpected cases, the draft acknowledges in Section 8.6.7. Reflexivity of skos:broader and Section 8.6.8. Cycles in the Hierarchical Relation (Reflexivity of skos:broaderTransitive) that many applications expect hierarchical relationships to be irreflexive and noncyclical. Given that this requirement will be quite common, is it appropriate to leave it as an exercise for each application to solve in a different way? Or would it be better to define subproperties with these constraints so this common requirement can be addressed by common SKOS infrastructure? """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 21:16:23 UTC