ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains

Dear Michael, 

Thank you for your detailed and helpful comments. In response to the
comment below:

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:52:48AM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
> 
> ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/145
> 
> Raised by: Alistair Miles
> On product: SKOS
> 
> Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:
> 
> """
> In the case that you are going to change the spec to /allow/ such chains (it's
> an "At Risk" feature): Consider talking about "/Sub/ Property Chains". At least
> all given examples are of this kind. This would allow to express such semantic
> conditions in OWL 2. (I think it's not very realistic that general property
> chains will be part of a future version of OWL.)
> """

We propose to amend the SKOS Reference with wording following your
suggestion.

Kind regards,

Alistair
Sean

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html

-- 
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 09:21:59 UTC