- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:17:15 +0200
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, > ACTION: Editors of the Use Cases to clean up the lists of requirements > in light of resolutions [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#action02] I had a first try browsing the requirements and checking their status. Jon and Daniel could and can not work on it these weeks, so I've put the stuff in on the wiki, where it can be later on edited and all changes explicitly recorded if they wish so. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCRMaterial/RequirementStatus This page lists the URIs of the requirement found on the SKOS Use Cases and Requirements Working Draft For each requirement, a short status declaration tells whether the requirement has been completely met. This indication can be sometimes nuanced. 'negatively met' especially means that the requirement is not met in the current SKOS vocabulary, but we are fully aware of it and eventually point at potential solutions outside of SKOS. For all of them, an explanation is given, most often as a link to one section of a SKOS document (Reference or Primer) that deals with the matter. In my perspective, all the accepted requirements are met. Most of the candidate requirements are also met, though some are met only partially, or via means that are outside of the SKOS proposal. I am only uncomfortable with two requirements for which the resolution are not that clear or obvious (compatibility with ISO 11179 and Consistency checking). But these are clearly not a matter for objection as far as I'm concerned. Cheers, Antoine
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 12:11:41 UTC