- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:14:15 +0200
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, public-lod@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Message-ID: <484FCFA7.9030503@w3.org>
Michael, afaik, yes. The process has been started with IETF, not yet completed. I added EricP to this mails' addressees, he knows better than I do. Ivan Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > Ivan, > >> which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it >> might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/) > > Do you know if the TAG has already agreed on this issue [1]? Is the team > submission in sync with it? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/01/rdf-media-types > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Michael Hausenblas, MSc. > Institute of Information Systems & Information Management > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > > http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:03 PM >> To: Richard Cyganiak >> Cc: Ed Summers; SWD Working SWD; public-lod@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Library of Congress Subject Headings as SKOS Linked Data >> >> >> >> Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>> Ed, >>> >>> A very cool service, and exemplary attention to detail! >>> >>> Of course, I still have a few suggestions! I haven't read >> through the >>> entire thread, so apologies if some of this was mentioned already. >>> >>> (I saw 303s being mentioned in the thread -- you are doing >> things the >>> right way, there's no need to do 303s at <sh95000541>. It is an >>> information resource and therefore 200 is fine. The concept is >>> <sh95000541#concept>, a URI that cannot be directly dereferenced via >>> HTTP, so you are consistent with httpRange-14, as explained >> in the Cool >>> URIs document. This is one of the nice things about hash URIs.) >>> >>> 1. The content-negotiated URI should send a "Vary: Accept" >> header. This >>> helps caches to deal correctly with content-negotiated resources. >>> >>> 2. The correct MIME type for N3 is "text/rdf+n3;charset=utf-8", not >>> "text/n3". (I think the spec used to recommend text/n3, but has been >>> changed some time ago.) >> >> We should also make a difference between turtle and N3. Roughly >> speaking, N3 is a superset of turtle; regardless of the rule >> features of >> N3, it also has some syntactic features to serialize graphs >> that turtle >> does not have. On the other hand, while most of the RDF environments >> today understand turtle, they may not understand N3. Ed, I am not sure >> which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it >> might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/) >> Ivan >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:14:41 UTC