- From: Svensson, Lars <l.svensson@d-nb.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:47:10 +0100
- To: "SKOS" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
In litteris suis de Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 14:58, public-esw-thes-request@w3.org <>scripsit: > At 11:07 AM 1/10/2008, Bernard Vatant wrote: >> OK Daniel, let me have another try if you don't mind :-) >>> >>> From my point of view, it does NOT make sense that skos:narrower >>> and broader are not transitive. >>> And if applications can go ahead and make them transitive by >>> expanding how they wish, that violates the asserted SKOS semantics. >>> Unless I'm misunderstanding something here, this sounds like a >>> formula for chaos. I know we're currently finialising the spec, but anyhow: We could invent two new properties skos:broaderTransitive (a subproperty of skos:broader) and skos:narrowerTransitive (a subproperty of skos:narrower) which both are declared as transitive. Could this be a solution? All the best, Lars -- Dr. Lars G. Svensson Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Informationstechnik Adickesallee 1 60322 Frankfurt http://www.d-nb.de/
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 07:47:23 UTC